Benchmarks board
Documentation-based editorial comparison. Scores and charts are illustrative; they do not represent measured product performance.
This board compares twelve email platforms using illustrative editorial scores. Latency and trend values are demonstration data rather than observed measurements. Review documented capabilities, then validate performance with your own domain and audience.
| # | Provider | Overall ↓ | Deliverability | Latency p50 | Reliability | Agent | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.1 | 8.9 | 300 ms | 9.0 | 9.6 | ||
| 2 | 8.5 | 8.8 | 520 ms | 9.0 | 6.8 | ||
| 3 | 8.4 | 9.0 | 560 ms | 9.2 | 6.5 | ||
| 4 | 8.2 | 8.4 | 390 ms | 8.8 | 7.9 | ||
| 5 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 320 ms | 9.3 | 7.0 | ||
| 6 | 7.6 | 8.5 | 280 ms | 8.9 | 7.4 | ||
| 7 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 740 ms | 8.5 | 6.1 | ||
| 8 | 7.4 | 8.0 | 450 ms | 8.3 | 6.4 | ||
| 9 | 7.2 | 8.1 | 610 ms | 8.2 | 4.8 | ||
| 10 | 7.1 | 7.8 | 700 ms | 8.0 | 5.5 | ||
| 11 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 680 ms | 8.1 | 5.2 | ||
| 12 | 6.9 | 8.0 | 590 ms | 8.0 | 4.9 |
Metric definitions
| Metric | Unit | What we measure |
|---|---|---|
| Deliverability | score | Distinguish acceptance, bounce, and complaint events from measured inbox placement. Any real placement study needs a declared mailbox cohort and raw evidence. |
| Send latency | ms p50 | Define the interval being timed, its units, and the sample before measuring. The example milliseconds here are fixtures, not observed provider latency. |
| Reliability | score | Check published status history, retry behavior, and failure visibility. Example reliability scores do not establish uptime. |
| Agent surface | score | Compare documented agent tools, supported actions, authentication, and approval requirements rather than assuming complete UI parity. |
| Design quality | score | Review output against a consistent brief, brand requirements, accessibility, and target clients. The example score is not a hands-on quality result. |
| Automation depth | score | Compare documented triggers, branching, event properties, and available actions against your workflow. Verify integration availability. |
Category shortlists live on Compare
Sending, design, and automations each get their own ranked HTML tables on /compare. Rank order always follows the displayed score. Brew belongs on the shortlist for its documented canvas and MCP workflows. Evaluate ecommerce platforms on the store-data requirements you need.